Recurring Decimals…..

Everything here is irrelevant

Mr Mishra, please STFU

with 4 comments

I have ranted before about Pankaj Mishra’s intellectual dishonesty, but his latest piece in the New York Times in the aftermath of the Mumbai terror attacks, can only be described as the work of lunatic who has lost all sense of perspectives.

Indeed, the outrage in Mumbai is the latest and clearest sign that the price of India’s uncompromising stance on Kashmir has become too high, imperiling its economy as well as its security

Yes, Mr Mishra, it is because of Kashmir that a bunch of 10-15 odd religiously motivated psychos trained their automatics and hand grenades on unarmed civilians!

Unfortunately, Mr Mishra is not alone among the blame the victim terrorist apologist’ crowd. As David Aaronovitch says,

There is a branch of apologetics – which I take crudely to be the belief that the crime is the fault of the victim – that assumes a milder form, and which I’ll call explanetics. So the explanatists view of the Mumbai massacres last week is that the cause lies in what concretely has been done to, or in the vicinity of, the young, cool-looking men with the grenades and the machineguns. (link)

And, ‘outrage in Mumbai’ ? Excuse me, in an article which mentions the Indian police as having supposedly ‘brutally suppressed’ protests in Kasmir, the killing of 150+ innocents and burning up of landmark buildings over two days is just simply an ‘outrage’ ?

Someone please send Mr Mishra a thesaurus for a Christmas gift.

I could probably go on about the meaningless ramblings, the gargantuan leaps of logic,  the anachronisms, an almost pity-inducing political naivete (India in Kashmir and China in Tibet are equivalent?), a messianic faith in Obama’s  ability to solve  both India and Pakistan’s problems through Kashmir(!), not to mention the poor editing and  general daftness that pervades the article.

But I will desist – the need to conserve my own sanity is more paramount. Instead I do recommend a full reading of the David Aaronovitch Times Online article quoted above.

(Both NYT and Times Online articles via Rohit)

Advertisements

Written by BongoP'o'ndit

December 3, 2008 at 12:07 am

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. >> India’s uncompromising stance on Kashmir has become too high

    Statements like these somehow manage to attach “cause” to gruesome killings that took place in Mumbai, Jaipur or Ahmedabad. Compulsion to find a political answer leads to trash that you have quoted. While everyone comes out in public with their condemnation, article like these provide implicit approval that these terrorists seek. The fact is that terrorists don’t represent anyone and should be treated as such.

    Neeraj Kumar

    December 3, 2008 at 4:39 am

  2. I try to stay away from Mishra – he makes my head spin by his leaps in logic.

    Even giving away Kashmir is really not going to stop the Jihadist. It is about time the apologists realize this. But then expecting likes of Mishra to stop their verbal diarrhoea is expecting the Jihadist to hug everyone and live happily. Why did I click on that link!!
    The Aaronovitch article is one of the best I have seen in the aftermath.

    Sakshi

    December 3, 2008 at 1:32 pm

  3. […] isn’t as bad of an apologist as some of the other recent commentators, but his political opinions are equally naive. Ghosh recommends a Spanish-style response in the […]

  4. Mishra is one big hypocrite.

    mystic wanderer

    December 5, 2008 at 10:19 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: