Posts Tagged ‘beijing olympics 2008’
..as he wins the first ever individual gold medal – also the first gold since 1980 – for India in Olympics (in 10m Air-rifle shooting) !!!!
Who knew watching an air-rifle competition was gong to be this exciting? I was going to change channels when I noticed Abhinav Bindra’s name on the finalist list . He started the final round in the fourth position, but gradually crawled his way to the top by the end of the 7th round. His shooting was extremely consistent even as the leader Hakkinen of Finland faltered. However the lead was only a slender 0.2 points at that stage. Bindra then faltered in the next two shots allowing Hakkinen to draw level at the ninth (penultimate) round – leaving me thinking this would be another story of the famous Indian choke. However, Bindra kept his nerves to shoot an amazing 10.8 (almost bulls eye) in the last round and convincingly winning the medal.
It was quite amazing to see how cool and calmly this guy carried himself after the win – unless the idea that he’s already become a national hero is yet to sink into him. At the medal podium, even as the second placed Chinese was crying and the bronze medalist Finn was waving his hand, Bindra was a picture of restraint and composure.
So once again, a big congratulation to Abhinav Bindra – you have done us proud.
Yes, there will eventually be talks of how shameful that our huge country is unable to produce more than a single gold medallist in more than 100 years of the game (about 50 if you consider post-independence), but for the moment, lets bask in the glory of having our national anthem finally being played at the medal ceremony.
PS: On an interview in NDTV, the sports minister Gill sez: I congratulate everyone including myself !
Not exactly what De Coubertin envisaged (Image from New York Times).
The flame did not actually out ‘die out’, but had to be extinguished several times, as pro-Tibetian protesters disrupted the Paris leg of the Olympic torch relay. This was after similar protests in London (in addition to protests by Uighur Muslims in Istanbul) and certainly there is more to come.
Much of the protest is in response to the recent Chinese crackdown in Tibet, as well as an overall activism against China’s poor human rights record and suppression of individual rights. Calls have gone out for sportsmen to boycott the games and for world leaders to skip the opening/closing ceremonies to mark solidarity with the Tibetans.
However, some have questioned the timing of these protests: asking why it took an Olympic Games to highlight the Tibetan struggle and if an event that is meant for sports is a right place to mix in politics.
The answer to the first is the brutal truth that most people simply don’t care beyond their own sphere until it becomes fashionable to do so. For many years, the question of Tibet’s right to independence from China has been a niche cause célèbre. But now with the whole world’s attention on China, it was somewhat inevitable and justified that pro-independent elements in Tibet would attempt to highlight their plight. Just as surely, most people will forget the issue about a month after the Olympics (how many people care anymore about Darfur, even while the situation there has hardly improved?).
The second issue of whether sports and politics should mix is tougher to answer. While the protests are far removed from the idealism of promoting world peace and healthy relation between nations that Baron Coubertin preached, the Olympics are no strangers to political controversies, starting from the Nazi propaganda of 1936 to the terrorist acts in Munich ’72 and reaching a nadir with the Cold War boycotts of 1980 and ’84.
[The games have been relatively free of politics since then, though not short of controversies - from doping (or how best the athletes dont get caught), overcommercialisation, corruption in the bidding process etc. No one other than a dewy-eyed innocent will claim that the Olympics is about the spirit anymore.]
So there is precedence in the politicization of the Olympics. More broadly, sporting bans have been used – arguably with success – in dismantling South Africa’s apartheid regime. And Olympics is certainly one of the biggest sporting events (actually, currently more of an event or a gala than sports). So there is certainly some justification there as well.
However, the bigger question is whether any of these protests will an effect on the Chinese government or its policies. When demonstrations took place in Tibet, the Chinese were able to crack-down severely, gagging the media in the process. They have also launched an aggressive public relations strategy responding to the world-wide protests.
But herein lies the importance of the current torch-relay protests: They are happening in major world cities, and most notably in socities that actually allow the freedom to voice dissent. With such prolonged agitations against the most prominent symbol of an event that is supposed to be the Chinese government’s grand showpiece, how long can they afford to keep up the bullying tactics ?
Conversely, it is also time for national governments around the world to use the opportunity in forcing China’s hand into tackling human rights issues (So far, such a policy hasn’t been forthcoming, most head of states have been satisfied to merely voice demured complaints).
Additionally, given the commercial nature of the Olympics, will such prolonged agitations force the mega-corporations sposoring the events, to think twice about the risks invested in associating their names with Beijing Olympics?
PS: Coming back to the torch relay, in our own country (where we sadly continue to suck at the Olympics), the torch is being carried by such sporting luminaries as Aamir Khan and Saif Ali Khan. Thankfully, one deserving torch bearer, Baichung Bhutia, has refused citing solidarity with the Tibetans.
(Thanks to Rohit for comments/discussions)