Archive for the ‘World Cup’ Category
However, written with a prejudiced view, not only of football, but of Europeans and football-fans in general, the article makes unsubstantiated conjectures galore, with nary a reference and expresses a naivete of its author that bordes on silliness. In another words, all set for a good fisking (just like this article that came before).
(click on more to read the rest)
click here for more
As mentioned in the previous post, the Zidane send-off has been the big talking point rather than the actual football played during yesterday’s World Cup final. Naturally, the question on everyone’s mind is what Materazzi did or say to provoke Zidane into such an action, since, in spite of Zidane’s record of similar indiscretions earlier (headbutting a player in a Champions League match and stomping on a Saudi player in a previous world Cup match), he is usually pretty calm and composed on the field.
Officially, Zidane has only hinted that Materazzi said something pretty abusive and promised to reveal it in a matter of days. But rumor mills have been on the overdrive, suggesting that Materazzi either said something about Zidane’s mother or called him a ‘dirty terrorist’ – a not so subtle jibe at Zidane’s ethnicity.
The Paris-based anti-racism advocacy group SOS-Racism issued a statement Monday quoting "several very well informed sources from the world of football" as saying Materazzi called Zidane a "dirty terrorist." It demanded that FIFA, soccer’s world governing body, investigate and take any appropriate action.
This accusation is pretty serious, especially in a period when FIFA is trying hard to keep racism out of football (anti-racism statements have been read out by team captains and banners displayed before each match of this World Cup). So it is no surprise to see Materazzi coming out with a statement denying the ‘terrorist’ comment. However, that statement itself sounds kind of funny to me:
"It is absolutely not true, I did not call him a terrorist. I’m ignorant. I don’t even know what the word means," the Italian news agency Ansa quoted Materazzi as saying after the Italian team returned to Rome.
Come again ? Unless something has been lost in translation – this is quite an amazing thing to say in this day and age. Where has Materazzi been living for the last few years ? Has he been so engrossed in playing football that he doesn’t know anything about terrorists and terrorism ? I am sure no body is going to believe that ! The statement also sounds like the raised hand and innocent look routine football players indulge in after committing a foul.
So the question remains – what did he say ? Note that Materrazi says he did not call Zidane ‘a terrorist’ – that’s like admitting he did say something. I guess we shall have to wait to hear from Zidane himself.
First Marco Matterazzi called the French star the Italian equivalent of ‘n*****’, and then insulted both his mother and his Muslim background by saying he is the ‘son of a terrorist whore.
…with a final match that was an uncomfortable reminder of several negative aspects of the tournament itself – players diving, wrong decisions by the referee, red card etc. The match will forever live in infamy for the incident – with 10 minutes remaining in the second half of extra-time and the score tied, Zinedine Zidane head-butted the Italian player Materazzi. The main referee missed the incident, but was alerted by the fourth referee (opinions differ as to whether TV replay was used), leading to Zidane’s ouster in the last international game for this legendary French midfielder.
The football itself was entertaining in parts, especially the back and forth action in the first half. France dominated the second half. Zidane’s amazing header in extra-time should have sealed the game except for an equally amazing save by Buffon. You don’t want to see a World Cup finals decided by penalties – but a decision has to reached somehow. Italy buried the ghost of the 1994 Baggio penalty miss to win. Poor Trezeguet – he will have to live with this one. Six years ago, he scored the winning goal against Italy in sudden death extra-time play to secure the Euro 2000 championship for France. This time he was the only French player to miss the penalty. So it goes.
I would have gone into a deeper analysis of the World Cup – but between this post by Confused and this one by Patrix (two bloggers with whom much of the World Cup excitement was shared), I believe most of the ground has been covered.
This morning I was afflicted by the sad thought of no more World Cup games to look forward to. In fact, there is very little sports action going on right now – no upcoming cricket tours for India, the ‘other’ football not due to start till September and I am not much of a baseball fan (till it reaches the knockout stage). The World Cup, while it lasted, provided an easy topic to blog about. Now I shall to find some real issues.
According to this report, the FIFA technical study group has chosen the following 23 players for the 2006 World Cup ‘all-star’ squad.
Goalkeepers: Gianluigi Buffon (Italy), Jens Lehmann (Germany), Ricardo (Portugal).
Defenders: Roberto Ayala (Argentina), John Terry (England), Lilian Thuram (France), Philipp Lahm (Germany), Fabio Cannavaro (Italy), Gianluca Zambrotta (Italy), Ricardo Carvalho (Portugal).
Midfielders: Ze Roberto (Brazil), Patrick Vieira (France), Zinedine Zidane (France), Michael Ballack (Germany), Andrea Pirlo (Italy), Gennaro Gattuso (Italy), Luis Figo (Portugal), Maniche (Portugal).
Strikers: Hernan Crespo (Argentina), Thierry Henry (France), Miroslav Klose (Germany), Francesco Totti (Italy), Luca Toni (Italy).
The list is sure to trigger some inevitable debates over players who deserve to be in there in place of others. I cannot argue much against the choice of goalies and defenders. But I doubt if Viera, Henry or Crespo performed so much better to get the nod ahead of players like Riquelme, Maxi Rodrigues, Ribery or even Kaka.
Well technically, there are still four – the losers from the semi-finals get to play another game on Saturday for the third position. But that game is as important as the position of the vice-president of the United States (well – maybe not now – but whatever).
Just in case anyone is wondering, I am talking about the FIFA World Cup 2006 – if you have been in a cave or living under a rock for the past month, now will be a good time to come out.
A month ago or even a couple of weeks ago, not many would have predicted this final: Argentina had the most balanced team, Brazil were the most talented, Germans were playing trumendously with home support. But it was the ageing French and the solid Italians who will get to fight it out this Sunday.
A France-Italy final can go either way – it could be a thrilling up and down contest or a dull defensive battle. Both teams have shown dual personalities through the tournament. Italy started off with a dashing attacking style against Ghana, then played out a boring, brawl-fest against USA and finally topped the group with a strong finish against the Czechs. Subsequently, they went back into a shell against Australia, escaping with a very questionable last-minute penalty. Since that much criticised game, however, they have displayed some dazzling football to beat Ukraine 3-0 with relative ease in the quarters and then Germany in a high-octane semi-final game. The heartening aspect of the game against Germany was that Lippi was not afraid of going all out for the win. Of course, their offense is comforted by the knowledge of having an almost impregnable defense (yet to concede a goal from the opponent) that can stop quick counter-attacks. Hopefully it will be this attacking Italian team that shows up for the final.
France meanwhile started badly – a continuation of their dismal form from the last World Cup. They barely scraped through the preliminary stage before finding some flashes of brilliance against Spain, and then put in a dominating second half performance against Brazil to secure the semi spot. Against Portugal they did not do much offensively. The penalty was justified even if Henry made it a tad dramatic. [Talking about drama, of course, brings to mind the Portugese team that seemed intent on 'selling' fouls to the referee (the usual routine of dive - followed by an arm-raised and I-cant-believe-you-din't-call-that incredulous look) instead of concentrating on the task of scoring a goals.]. Again hoping that in the finals it is the French team that won against Spain and Brazil that shows up to play – with some dazzling moves by Zidane.
Apart from Zidane, I think the biggest gain for France in this World Cup has been the emergence of Ribery. This guy has speed, stamina and more than decent skills. Looking forward to much more action from him in Euro 2008.
Final note: my hope for the finals: Fra 3 Ita 2 (or perhaps 2-1) with the final goal coming in extra-time like the Euro 2000 finals. But I have a feeling it will be Italy 2-0.
Feeling too tensed watching the Germany v Italy semi-final. Trying my hand at some live-blogging (sort-off).
After about 32 minutes – the game seems evenly matched, although I have to admit that Italy has had slightly better chances.
33min40sec: Schneider misses the best chance so far in the game to score – hits over the bar!!
German third not playing up to mark ! The passing between Klose and Podolsky is absent. Ballack not doing much either. Borowski has been the best German player so far.
39′ : good acting by Totti draws the yellow against Borowski…btw the card was probably called for.
UPDATE (the day after): All-right, y’all know what happened in the game. My first attempt at live-blogging was a damp squib – a friend came over to watch the game with me in the second half and he was supporting Italy. So time was spent arguing with him. After that I was drowning my sorrows with beer (some very good German wheat beer) and bratwursts – and some nice fireworks to wrap up the evening.
The German team played beyond expectations, spurred on by an enthusiastic coach and I am looking forward to them doing well in Euro 2008 (Austria/Switzerland).
The Italians displayed an extremely skilfull brand of football yesterday and deserved the victory. It pains me to say this, but that first goal in the 118th minute was a beauty – an unhurried pinpoint pass inside the box and a perfect shot – with enough power and the right amount of curl to beat the outstretched hands of Lehmann and sling into the net. My problem with the Italians has mostly been with the dour defensive strategy they adopt – especially if they go up early. That and their propensity to dive rather theatrically on the field. The theatrics continued (although last night, some of the Germans were guilty of it too), but this team has been different strategy-wise. With the exception of the matches against the US and Australia, they have played a visually pleasing, attacking football. Good luck to them in the finals. But I will probably be supporting whoever wins today.
….and their football/cricket teams. Someone is always whining after a major loss and blaming the defeat on external factors rather than honestly accepting that they suck. After losing their quarterfinal match against Portugal on penalties (yet again!), Alan Shearer said yesterday:
"I wouldn’t be surprised if Wayne Rooney goes back to the Manchester United training ground and sticks one on Ronaldo,"
This actually echoes the sentiment of a section of the English press, which incredibly blames Christiano Ronaldo for Wayne Rooney receiving the red card in yesterdays game. I do not think Ronaldo has won many neutral fans by his constant theatrics on the field – particularly his wink at the Portugese bench after Rooney received marching orders was in extremely bad taste. But he did not force Rooney to shove his boots into Carvalho’s unmentionables (that must have hurt !) – and even if he might have instigated it, there was no coercion for Rooney to shove Ronaldo right in front of the referee (if you are going to do something like that, do it behind the referees back – like Louis Figo’s head butt on van Bommel).
In the end, one does feel a bit for the English players. They are a talented lot but were lacking a good game plan (bad coaching?). Characteristically, England played their best game in the dire circumstance of being down to 10 men. Also largely unsurprising was their failure at the spot-kicks. However, everyone but Hergreaves missing a penalty shot ? That’s a bit too much. Don’t these guys practice for the PKs ?
On the other hand, Germany as usual, won a penalty shoot-out. Thoughts on that and the remaining quarter-final games, as well as hopes for the semi-final results, in another post.