<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unfair comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://palscape.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/unfair-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://palscape.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/unfair-comments/</link>
	<description>Everything here is irrelevant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://palscape.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/unfair-comments/#comment-5761</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palscape.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/unfair-comments/#comment-5761</guid>
		<description>ha! that&#039;s quite unexpected :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha! that&#8217;s quite unexpected <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrix</title>
		<link>http://palscape.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/unfair-comments/#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://palscape.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/unfair-comments/#comment-1735</guid>
		<description>It may be presumptuous of McArdle to make an over generalization, but she is partly right. To prove discrimination is quite difficult. 

Currently, I am working on analyzing opportunity and access indicators for affordable housing and the differences are quite obviously tilted against minorities and immigrants. But surprisingly, although these differences wane for second-generation immigrants irrespective of color, blacks (as African-Americans) continue to be disadvantaged. So there is much more than simple prejudice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be presumptuous of McArdle to make an over generalization, but she is partly right. To prove discrimination is quite difficult. </p>
<p>Currently, I am working on analyzing opportunity and access indicators for affordable housing and the differences are quite obviously tilted against minorities and immigrants. But surprisingly, although these differences wane for second-generation immigrants irrespective of color, blacks (as African-Americans) continue to be disadvantaged. So there is much more than simple prejudice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
